There have always been myths about loopholes in the law and its quite rare that any of them are true. Recently, a few have popped up regarding driving laws, and as usual, there are very few that have any truth to them.

Possibly the most frequently heard claim is that if a police officer fills in some information incorrectly on a traffic offence ticket, like a speeding ticket, then the ticket is void. This, as with most of these theories, is not true.

This is because the ticket that he gives to you is not official evidence, it is just a brief overview of the offence and if you question the validity of the ticket due to an error, then all that will happen is that a court summons will be sent to you and the officer will have to draw up an official statement which he is not likely to make any errors on.

However, if you dont believe that you have committed the supposed offence and the officer has made a mistake on the ticket, you may be able to use it as evidence that the officer paid insufficient attention to the incident and has a sloppy approach.

If however the only defence you have is that the officer made a mistake on the ticket, then this doesnt really warrant any kind of defence and you will probably be charged.

Another myth that people have thought will get them off the hook, is that it is a violation of human rights to ask who was driving at the time of the offence. It is often believed that if you are the registered keeper of the vehicle and theyre asking you who was driving it, that you do not have to tell them because it is within your human rights to withhold this information.

In fact, this is simply not true. Human have been altered so that you do have to divulge who was driving at the time of offence or you face six points on your licence and a substantial fine. This is because of the importance of road safety.

Another very common mistake that drivers make is that when they buy a new car, they are covered from the insurance on their old vehicle to drive any car owned by someone else with their permission, and as they havent made themselves the registered keeper of the vehicle yet, therefore it still officially belongs to someone else, therefore they are insured.

This is not true either, if money has exchanged hands for the car then as far as a court of law is concerned the car belongs to you, and if you have not transferred the insurance over from your old vehicle, then you are not insured on the new one, and therefore driving illegally.